MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Time Profile of Time-Dependent Area Under the ROC Curve for Survival Data

2015· article· en· W2077106477 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jérôme Lambert, Raphaël Porcher, Sylvie Chevret

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics in Medical Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReceiver operating characteristicBiomarkerStatisticsHazard ratioSensitivity (control systems)Area under the curveValue (mathematics)Area under curveBinary numberHazardMeasure (data warehouse)Survival analysisConstant (computer programming)MathematicsOncologyMedicineInternal medicineComputer scienceData miningBiologyConfidence intervalEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the setting of survival analysis, the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) has been proposed as a discrimination measure of interest. In contrast with the diagnostic setting, the definitions of time-dependent sensitivity and specificity are required. This paper evaluates the time-dependent profile of the resulting AUC(t), which has not been previously assessed. We show that, even when the effect of a binary biomarker on the hazard rate is constant, the value of AUC(t) varies over time according to the prevalence of the marker. The Time-profile of the continuous biomarker is illustrated with numerical integration, and data on several prognostic factors in AML are examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.089
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.089
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.177
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistics in Medical ResearchSame topicDigital Imaging for Blood DiseasesFrench-language works237,207