MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077137674 · doi:10.1029/2002gl014843

Competitive adsorption of atmospheric trace gases onto ice at 228 K: HNO<sub>3</sub>/HCl, 1‐Butanol/Acetic acid and 1‐Butanol/HCl

2002· article· en· W2077137674 on OpenAlexaff
O. Sokolov, Jonathan P. D. Abbatt

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdsorptionButanolAcetic acidChemistryn-ButanolNitric acidTrace gasInorganic chemistryHydrochloric acidAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyEthanolOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For HNO3/HCl, 1‐butanol/acetic acid and 1‐butanol/HCl, adsorption isotherms have been measured at 228 K in an ice‐coated flow tube with both gases present at pressures between 10−6 and 10−4 torr. For HNO3/HCl, the uptake of each gas is lowered by the presence of the other in the surface saturated regime, but the total surface coverage of adsorbed gases is similar to the coverage of HNO3 adsorbing alone. There is no delay to the onset of the displacement of one adsorbed acid by the other and HNO3 bonds more strongly than HCl. Competition also occurs between 1‐butanol and acetic acid in the saturated regime of their isotherms, but not in a manner consistent with a two‐species Langmuir model. By contrast, 1‐butanol is not affected by the presence of a saturated surface of HCl.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207