Postural influence on the neutral zone of the porcine cervical spine under anterior–posterior shear load
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Segmental instability, characterized by excessive or aberrant movement of the vertebrae can be assessed quantitatively using mechanical characteristics within a region of minimal resistance called the neutral zone. The diagnosis of instability is often used to decide whether or not to surgically fuse the vertebrae. Alterations in flexion/extension posture cause changes in both contact area and spacing between articulating facets that may lead to changes in the mechanical response of the functional spinal unit (FSU) within the neutral zone. This investigation quantified neutral zone (NZ) length under anterior and posterior shear loading and the influence of posture on the shear NZ characteristics of the vertebral joint. Thirty porcine cervical FSUs (15 C34 and 15 C56) were tested. Endplate area was calculated from measurements of the exposed endplates while facet angles were measured from X-rays taken in the transverse plane. Specimens were exposed to a 300 N compressive preload followed by a test to determine flexion/extension NZ limits. These limits were used as target angles during shear passive tests performed in extended and flexed postures. Displacement rate during shear passive tests was 0.2mm/s and five cycles of anterior-posterior shear were performed to a target of ±400 N in a randomized order of extended, neutral and flexed postures. Shear NZ length and average stiffness were quantified. Stiffness within the shear NZ was 67 N/mm in the neutral posture. Extended postures produced a 37% (p<0.0001) increase in shear stiffness within the NZ compared to both flexed and neutral postures. Posture did not influence shear NZ length. Therefore, a true region of zero stiffness does not exist during shear loading with a baseline compressive load. Neutral zone length for the porcine FSU exposed to shear load was not influenced, despite known changes in facet articulation, by changing posture. Average stiffness increased likely as a result of increased contact area and force in extension. The results from this investigation demonstrate that postural deviation of the vertebral joint is not likely a significant confounding factor when assessing segmental stability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".