MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077154146 · doi:10.1081/sta-120037447

Maximal Asymptotic Biases of<i>M</i>-Estimators of Location with Preliminary Scale Estimates

2004· article· en· W2077154146 on OpenAlexafffund
John R. Collins, D. Szatmari-Voicu

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEstimatorMathematicsEquivariant mapScale (ratio)StatisticsDistribution (mathematics)Variance (accounting)Asymptotic distributionTrimmed estimatorScale parameterLocation parameterApplied mathematicsMinimum-variance unbiased estimatorBias of an estimatorMathematical analysisPhysicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the problem of finding the maximal asymptotic bias of an M-estimator of a location parameter, using a preliminary estimate of the unknown scale parameter, when the error distribution is assumed to lie in an ϵ-contamination neighborhood of a fixed symmetric unimodal distribution. The least favorable contaminating distribution is shown to put all its mass at ∞ under some fairly general conditions. A particular case considered is that of the auxiliary scale estimator being a location-invariant and scale-equivariant version of a trimmed variance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.067
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.067
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and MethodsSame topicAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsFrench-language works237,207