MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077155586 · doi:10.1021/nn4064659

Electron Beam Lithography on Irregular Surfaces Using an Evaporated Resist

2014· article· en· W2077155586 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Nano · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistMaterials scienceNanolithographyElectron-beam lithographyPolystyreneLithographyNanotechnologyEvaporationRaman spectroscopyCantileverCathode rayOptoelectronicsOpticsElectronPolymerComposite materialFabrication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An electron beam resist is typically applied by spin-coating, which cannot be reliably applied on nonplanar, irregular, or fragile substrates. Here we demonstrate that the popular negative electron beam resist polystyrene can be coated by thermal evaporation. A high resolution of 30 nm half-pitch was achieved using the evaporated resist. As a proof of concept of patterning on irregular surfaces, we fabricated nanostructures on the AFM cantilever and the optical fiber. Although an ice (H2O) resist has also been recently demonstrated as being capable of nanopatterning on irregular and fragile substrates, it requires specially designed accessories mounted inside a SEM chamber, whereas our process works with any thermal evaporator and is thus simpler and much more accessible. Nanofabrication on nonplanar surfaces may find applications in fields such as (AFM) tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for chemical analysis and lab-on-fiber technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it