Gametoclonal and Somaclonal Variation among Head Cabbage Androgenic Lines of R1 and R2 Generations Obtained from Jaguar F1 Hybrid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Head cabbage androgenic genotypes of R1 and R2 generations derived from Jaguar F1 donor hybrid wereevaluated according to their agroeconomical characters, ability for generative propagation, self-incompatibility,intraline uniformity and stability of morphological characters. Most of R1 and R2 genotypes had desiredmorphological characters. However, in R1 generation 21 lines showed lack of internal uniformity probably due tothe somaclonal variation. Genotypes of R1 and R2 generation from different embryos were more diversified thangenotypes derived from the same embryo according to self-incompatibility, ability for seed setting, vegetativeperiod, head shape, internal sump length and mass of head. Rigid selection of androgenic material at R0, R1 andR2 pedigree according to absence of somaclonal variation, agroeconomical traits, self-compatibility and seedsetting ability seemed to be crucial for the deriving stable and suitable for the breeding genotypes of headcabbage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".