A work-efficient GPU algorithm for level set segmentation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a novel GPU level set segmentation algorithm that is both work-efficient and step-efficient. Our algorithm: (1) has linear work-complexity and logarithmic step-complexity, both of which depend only on the size of the active computational domain and do not depend on the size of the level set field; (2) limits the active computational domain to the minimal set of changing elements by examining both the temporal and spatial derivatives of the level set field; (3) tracks the active computational domain at the granularity of individual level set field elements instead of tiles without performance penalty; and (4) employs a novel parallel method for removing duplicate elements from unsorted data streams in a constant number of steps. We apply our algorithm to 3D medical images and we demonstrate that in typical clinical scenarios, our algorithm reduces the total number of processed level set field elements by 16× and is 14× faster than previous GPU algorithms with no reduction in segmentation accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it