MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Expression of MCT1 and MCT4 in a patient with mitochondrial myopathy

2001· article· en· W2077208504 on OpenAlexaff
Steven K. Baker, Mark A. Tarnopolsky, Arend Bonen

Bibliographic record

VenueMuscle & Nerve · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster University Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlycolysisSkeletal muscleOxidative phosphorylationLactic acidLactic acidosisMonocarboxylate transporterInternal medicineEndocrinologyIntracellular pHIntracellularMitochondrial myopathyMitochondrionTransporterMyopathyAcidosisChemistryBiologyBiochemistryMetabolismMitochondrial DNAMedicineGeneBacteriaGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mitochondrial myopathies (MM) are characterized by alterations in oxidative phosphorylation. The resultant increase in glycolytic flux produces a variable lactic acidosis. Intracellular acidification can induce both metabolic and, in the case of skeletal muscle, contractile dysfunction. Skeletal muscle lactate transporters have recently been identified which include both monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) and 4 (MCT4). Lactate import into oxidative skeletal muscle appears to be catalyzed by MCT1, whereas its extrusion from glycolytic fibers may be mediated by MCT4. We describe the expression of these isoforms in a patient with MM as compared to controls (n = 5). MCT4 content was 86% (>3 SD) higher in the patient with MM, whereas MCT1 content was less markedly elevated (47%), as compared to controls. These findings support previous work suggesting that the major role of MCT4 is to defend intracellular pH by extruding lactate and H(+) to the interstitium. The role of MCT1 in MM is less clear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMuscle & NerveSame topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207