MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

NURSING CARE ACCORDING TO THE OREM’S THEORY: CARE FOR A PATIENT WITH BIPOLAR AFFECTIVE DISORDER

2013· article· pt· W2077209852 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Pesquisa Cuidado é Fundamental Online · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursing carePsychologyNursingGerontologyHumanitiesMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Realizar a Sistematização da Assistência de Enfermagem (SAE) a uma idosa portadora de TAB, norteando-se pelos preceitos da Teoria do Autocuidado de Orem. A assistência domiciliar desenvolveu-se em dez visitas domiciliares a paciente com a intenção de formular um plano de cuidados envolvendo diretamente a família. Nesse contexto, avaliou-se a família e a paciente por meio do Modelo Calgary de Avaliação Familiar (MCAF), e planejaram-se cuidados por meio da SAE. Constatou-se que há compreensão da paciente sobre a importância da sua família para seu cuidado e que, apesar das discussões, o vínculo de afeto é forte, sendo concluído a necessidade de incluir mais conversas durante o dia-a-dia. Assim, compreende-se a importância de intervenções junto ao paciente e a família para minimizar os efeitos da doença no relacionamento destes. Além disso, é fato que idosos portadores de TAB frequentemente tenham diferentes necessidades de tratamento em comparação com indivíduos jovens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it