The dependence of thymine and thymidine Raman spectra on solvent
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent work has focused on developing Raman spectroscopy as a noninvasive probe of DNA interactions with solvents, intercalants, proteins, and other ligands. Here, we report the Raman spectra of thymine in eight solvents and thymidine in nine solvents obtained with visible excitation. Raman spectra under acidic, neutral, and basic conditions were also obtained of both thymine and thymidine. Changes in both the frequencies and intensities of several of the vibrational bands in the 8001800 cm 1 region are observed. No evidence of deprotonation in the different solvents is observed for either thymine or thymidine. Correlations of the observed frequency shifts of specific vibrational modes with characteristic properties of the solvent for both thymine and thymidine show a significant correlation with acceptor and donor numbers, measures of the hydrogen-bonding ability of the solvent, in both thymine and thymidine. These results are interpreted in terms of hydrogen-bonding interactions between the N-H protons of the thymine base and lone pairs of electrons on the solvent molecules and between the solvent hydrogens and lone pairs on C=O sites. The solvent-dependent intensity in vibrational bands of thymine between 1500 and 1800 cm 1 indicates a strong interaction between thymine and solvent at the C=O and N-H sites that leads to separation of the C=O stretches from the C=C stretch. The intensity variations with solvent were much smaller for thymidine than for thymine, perhaps as a result of replacing the N 1 proton by the sugar. These results suggest that Raman spectroscopy is uniquely sensitive to specific interactions of thymine and thymidine with their environment.Key words: Raman spectroscopy, thymine, thymidine, solvent effects, hydrogen bonding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".