MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077255159 · doi:10.3166/ges.6.115-128

Innovation et société : pour élargir l'analyse des effets territoriaux de l'innovation

2004· article· fr· W2077255159 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGéographie Économie Société · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité TÉLUQUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSocial innovationPolitical scienceArtPublic relations

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RésuméTraditionnellement, l’innovation a été associée aux technologies et a été abordée dans un cadre individuel ou entrepreneurial. Ce texte soutient que l’innovation s’inscrit dans un processus plus large, porteur d’un ensemble de dimensions. Le processus d’innovation est certes technique, mais il est aussi social. Étudier une innovation, c’est mettre en lumière les ressources sociales, techniques, économiques, politiques et culturelles qui sont mobilisées par des acteurs individuels et collectifs. Cet ensemble d’éléments trouve corps et sens du fait qu’il prend place à une période et en un lieu précis. Dès lors, tant la dimension territoriale que la dimension temporelle sont importantes et donc à prendre en considération, car elles sous-tendent ce que les auteurs appellent « innovation socioterritoriale ».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it