MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077261688 · doi:10.1080/01647950408684399

A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part iv. tribe Amblyseiini Wainstein, subtribe Arrenoseiina Chant and McMurtry

2004· review· en· W2077261688 on OpenAlexaff
D. A. Chant, J. A. McMurtry

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Acarology · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytoseiidaeAcariSubfamilyCladogramBiologyTaxonTribeGenusZoologyBotanyCladisticsEcologyAnthropologyPhylogeneticsGeneticsPredationSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The subtribe Arrenoseiina Chant and McMurtry is diagnosed and reviewed. One new genus is proposed: Pararrenoseius n. gen. The other genera included are: Arrenoseius Wainstein, Iphiseiodes De Leon, Phytoscutus Muma, and Paraamblyseius Muma. Keys to the constituent generic taxa are provided and representative species are figured. We propose a cladogram suggesting the relationships between these taxa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of AcarologySame topicInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlFrench-language works237,207