MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077265831 · doi:10.1107/s0907444905018822

Surface-entropy reduction used in the crystallization of human choline acetyltransferase

2005· article· en· W2077265831 on OpenAlexaff
Aeri Kim, Tomáš Dobránsky, R. Jane Rylett, Brian H. Shilton

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEnzyme Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystallizationReduction (mathematics)Choline acetyltransferaseChemistryMathematicsBiological systemBiologyNeuroscienceOrganic chemistryGeometryCholinergic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) synthesizes the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh) from choline and acetyl-CoA. A crystal structure of human ChAT has been a long-standing goal in the neuronal signalling field. Milligram quantities of pure ChAT can be purified [Kim et al. (2005), Protein Expr. Purif. 40, 107-117], but exhaustive crystallization efforts failed to produce any crystals suitable for high-resolution structural studies. To obtain high-quality crystals of human ChAT, a truncation was made in a large poorly conserved loop region and high-entropy side chains were removed from the surface of the protein. The resulting 'entropy-reduced' ChAT (MR = 68.1 kDa) crystallizes readily and reproducibly and the crystals diffract X-rays to approximately 2.2 A. The availability of these crystals will allow us to study the structure of human ChAT on its own as well as in complex with its substrates and inhibitor molecules, leading to a greater understanding of its catalytic mechanism and regulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section D Biological CrystallographySame topicEnzyme Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207