MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Restoration of the taxon <i>Lycodes marisalbi</i>, with notes on its disjunct Arctic distribution

2000· article· en· W2077268470 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Rask Møller

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fish Biology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisjunctArcticBiologySagittariusTaxonBaySubspeciesBeaufort scaleDisjunct distributionPaleontologyOceanographyEcologyPopulationGeologyPhylogenetic treeAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Examination of a large number of Lycodes specimens from the Arctic Ocean showed that western Canadian Arctic (Beaufort Sea) specimens, hitherto identified as Lycodes pallidus Collett, 1878 are identical with Lycodes marisalbi Knipovich, 1906 from the White Sea. Both populations have a ventro‐medio‐lateral lateral line system, not in accordance with the ventral and posterior medio‐lateral type of lateral line found in L. pallidus. Lycodes marisalbi, which has been regarded as a subspecies of L. pallidus since 1954, is hence restored as a valid taxon. A revised diagnosis, description and synonymy are given. The extended distribution range of L. marisalbi is probably disjunct (White Sea and Beaufort Sea), indicating a biogeographic pattern characterized by affinity to relatively shallow water with reduced salinity. Specimens from Franklin Bay (Beaufort Sea) with light vertical bars, previously assigned to Lycodes sagittarius McAllister, 1975 are here assigned to L. marisalbi, restricting L. sagittarius to include uniformly brown specimens only.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fish BiologySame topicMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchFrench-language works237,207