MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077285906 · doi:10.2741/2249

Matrix metalloproteinases: control of vascular function and their potential role in preeclampsia

2006· review· en· W2077285906 on OpenAlexafffund
Manoj M. Lalu

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in bioscience · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Heritage Foundation for Medical ResearchFondation pour la Recherche Médicale
KeywordsMatrix metalloproteinasePreeclampsiaEndocrinologyVasoconstrictionInternal medicineReceptorVasodilationMedicineEndothelin receptorEndothelial dysfunctionMediatorBiologyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preeclampsia is a pregnancy specific disorder characterised by hypertension and proteinuria occurring after the twentieth week of gestation. Preeclampsia induced hypertension is the result of increased vascular reactivity and endothelial dysfunction, however, the mechanisms underlying this state remain elusive. One possible mediator may be the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), a family of proteinases typically recognized for long term tissue remodelling. This review examines the evidence suggesting a role for MMPs in acutely regulating vascular function. Studies have shown that MMPs can activate vasoconstrictors (e.g. endothelin), inactivate vasodilators (e.g. calcitonin gene related peptide) and transactivate cell surface receptors responsible for vasoconstriction (e.g. epidermal growth factor receptor). The potential role of these proteinases in preeclampsia will then be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in bioscienceSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207