MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077324874 · doi:10.1190/1.3255273

A combined effective medium approach for modeling the viscoelastic properties of heavy oil reservoirs

2009· article· en· W2077324874 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Agnibha Das, Michael Batzle

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersColorado School of MinesUniversity of Houston
KeywordsLithologyGeologyModuliViscoelasticityShear modulusOil sandsCarbonate rockBulk modulusMineralogyWork (physics)Geotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceThermodynamicsPetrologySedimentary rockPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frequency dependent bulk and shear moduli of heavy oil saturated rocks were modeled using a combination of Self Consistent Approximation (SCA) and Differential Effective Medium (DEM) theory. Such an approach honors the rock microstructure, i.e., a continuity of both the solid and fluid phases in the rock; and also makes realistic estimates that fall within the Hashin-Shtrikman (HS) bounds for elastic moduli. We have modeled two heavy oil saturated rocks that have widely different lithology. One is a carbonate rock from Uvalde County, Texas and the other is tar sand from Canada. Calculated modulus values using the combined effective medium scheme are in good agreement with measured data. This approach could be used as a fluid substitution scheme for heavy oil reservoirs especially tar sands underdoing thermal depletion, where even the generalized Gassmann's equation doesn't work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207