MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077334694 · doi:10.1007/s10350-004-0698-5

Angiosarcoma of the Colon and Rectum: Report of a Case and Review of the Literature

2004· review· en· W2077334694 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiseases of the Colon & Rectum · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAngiosarcomaSigmoid colonRectumColorectal surgeryHemangiosarcomaMalignancyRadiologySurgeryRadiation therapyInternal medicineAbdominal surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Angiosarcoma is a malignancy that occurs rarely in the gastrointestinal tract. We present a case of a 77-year-old male who had rectal bleeding and obstructive bowel symptoms. A large near-obstructing mass was seen endoscopically, but biopsies were inconclusive. A CT scan showed a large sigmoid lesion, and the patient had surgical resection. A large hemorrhagic-appearing tumor was found at operation. Angiosarcoma of the sigmoid colon was diagnosed on histologic examination. After colonic resection, the patient rapidly developed numerous liver metastases and died six months later. A review of the literature reveals only 12 other reported cases of colorectal angiosarcoma; 62 percent of these patients died within one year of surgical resection. The role of adjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy is unclear. In conclusion, colorectal angiosarcomas are rare tumors that behave very aggressively, and the outcome is generally poor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it