Hégémonie, dissidence et contre-discours : réflexions sur les périphéries du discours social en 1889
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir d'une recherche sur la totalité du discours social français en 1889, l'auteur se demande où et comment se produisent dans la topographie discursive des idées et des formes qui échappent à l'emprise de l'hégérnonie et à l'acceptabilité dominante. Il distingue les nouveautés radicales des innovations ostentatoires ainsi que des réactivations d'éléments obsolètes. Il cherche à définir les notions de périphérie, de dissidence, d'hétérologie et de contrediscours. À partir d'exemples empruntés aux propagandes socialiste et féministe, il montre combien les notions d'impensable, d'indicible et d'inacceptable sont subordonnées à une acceptabilité strictement historique. La nouveauté n'apparaît jamais de façon franche ou nette, mais toujours dans la maladresse et l'abus de langage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".