Bivalent Binding to γA/γ′-Fibrin Engages Both Exosites of Thrombin and Protects It from Inhibition by the Antithrombin-Heparin Complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thrombin exosite 1 binds the predominant gamma(A)/gamma(A)-fibrin form with low affinity. A subpopulation of fibrin molecules, gamma(A)/gamma'-fibrin, has an extended COOH terminus gamma'-chain that binds exosite 2 of thrombin. Bivalent binding to gamma(A)/gamma'-fibrin increases the affinity of thrombin 10-fold, as determined by surface plasmon resonance. Because of its higher affinity, thrombin dissociates 7-fold more slowly from gamma(A)/gamma'-fibrin clots than from gamma(A)/gamma(A)-fibrin clots. After 24 h of washing, however, both gamma(A)/gamma'- and gamma(A)/gamma(A)-fibrin clots generate fibrinopeptide A when incubated with fibrinogen, indicating the retention of active thrombin. Previous studies demonstrated that heparin heightens the affinity of thrombin for fibrin by simultaneously binding to fibrin and exosite 2 on thrombin to generate a ternary heparin-thrombin-fibrin complex that protects thrombin from inhibition by antithrombin and heparin cofactor II. In contrast, dermatan sulfate does not promote ternary complex formation because it does not bind to fibrin. Heparin-catalyzed rates of thrombin inhibition by antithrombin were 5-fold slower in gamma(A)/gamma'-fibrin clots than they were in gamma(A)/gamma(A)-fibrin clots. This difference reflects bivalent binding of thrombin to gamma(A)/gamma'-fibrin because (a) it is abolished by addition of a gamma'-chain-directed antibody that blocks exosite 2-mediated binding of thrombin to the gamma'-chain and (b) the dermatan sulfate-catalyzed rate of thrombin inhibition by heparin cofactor II also is lower with gamma(A)/gamma'-fibrin than with gamma(A)/gamma(A)-fibrin clots. Thus, bivalent binding of thrombin to gamma(A)/gamma'-fibrin protects thrombin from inhibition, raising the possibility that gamma(A)/gamma'-fibrin serves as a reservoir of active thrombin that renders thrombi thrombogenic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".