Seismic Fragility Assessment of Concrete Bridge Pier Reinforced with Superelastic Shape Memory Alloy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In an attempt to reduce permanent displacement and damage, a hybrid reinforced concrete (RC) bridge pier configuration is considered in the present study. The plastic hinge region of the bridge pier is reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA) and the remaining portion with regular steel. This paper focuses on fragility‐based seismic vulnerability assessment for a SMA‐RC bridge pier considering residual displacement, displacement ductility, and performance criteria as the demand parameters. Fragility curves are developed to assess the relative vulnerability of a SMA‐RC bridge pier and a conventional steel‐RC bridge pier using probabilistic seismic demand model (PSDM). The fragility curves are developed with a suite of 20 near‐fault ground motions using incremental dynamic analysis. The fragility curves provide insight into the failure probability of the bridge piers and aid in expressing the impact of SMA on the bridge pier vulnerability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it