MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077418944 · doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2009.0204

Energy storage system scheduling for an isolated microgrid

2011· article· en· W2077418944 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Renewable Power Generation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogridAutomotive engineeringDiesel fuelEnergy storageScheduling (production processes)Electric power systemWind powerComputer scienceReliability engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringRenewable energyPower (physics)Electrical engineeringOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A knowledge-based expert system (KBES) is proposed for the scheduling of an energy storage system (ESS) installed in a wind–diesel isolated power system. The program optimises the cost of operation by determining the diesel generation and the charging/discharging cycles of the storage system from the wind and load profiles one hour in advance. The rules created aim to minimise the use of the dump load normally associated with diesel operation. The results are compared to an offline optimisation algorithm applied to the same power system and ESS size that has a 24-h lookahead. The results obtained show that by minimising the energy wasted through the dump load with the use of the ESS and KBES controller, the required diesel generation is reduced, therefore reducing operation costs and emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.755

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it