Model-based automated detection of echolocation calls using the link detector
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The link detector combines a model-based spectral peak tracker with an echo filter to detect echolocation calls of bats. By processing calls in the spectrogram domain, the links detector separates calls that overlap in time, including call harmonics and echoes. The links detector was validated by using an artificial recording environment, including synthetic calls, atmospheric absorption, and echoes, which provided control of signal-to-noise ratio and an absolute ground truth. Maximum hit rate (2% false positive rate) for the links detector was 87% compared to 1.5% for a spectral peak detector. The difference in performance was due to the ability of the links detector to filter out echoes. Detection range varied across species from 13 to more than 20 m due to call bandwidth and frequency range. Global features of calls detected by the links detector were compared to those of synthetic calls. The error in all estimates increased as the range increased, and estimates of minimum frequency and frequency of most energy were more accurate compared to maximum frequency. The links detector combines local and global features to automatically detect calls within the machine learning paradigm and detects overlapping calls and call harmonics in a unified framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".