MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077439805 · doi:10.2164/jandrol.111.015289

Effects of Once‐Daily Tadalafil on Treatment Satisfaction, Psychosocial Outcomes, Spontaneous Erections, and Measures of Endothelial Function in Men With Erectile Dysfunction But Naive to Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors

2012· article· en· W2077439805 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Andrology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsTadalafilErectile dysfunctioncGMP-specific phosphodiesterase type 5PsychosocialMedicineErectile functionPhosphodiesteraseUrologyInternal medicinePsychiatryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous studies established the efficacy of once-daily tadalafil for men with erectile dysfunction. However, no trial has focused on the effects of such treatment on men without previous experience using oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. Patients were randomized (2:1) to once-daily tadalafil 5 mg (with possible down-titration to 2.5 mg; n = 146) or placebo (n = 69) for 12 weeks. Among 215 patients (mean age, 52 years), once-daily tadalafil treatment resulted in 61.7% of study participants reporting their ability to achieve and maintain erections as being much better or very much better (vs 21.7% on placebo; P < .001). Tadalafil significantly improved treatment satisfaction on the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (P < .001 vs placebo at end point) and psychosocial outcomes on the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) questionnaire (least squares mean difference in SEAR total score change from baseline, 11.8 [95% confidence interval, 5.4%-18.2%; P < .001 vs placebo]). Patients receiving once-daily tadalafil also experienced a higher proportion of daily self-reported spontaneous morning erections at end point (58.7%) compared with placebo (42.2%; P < .001 for the between-treatment difference in changes from baseline). However, no significant differences in parameters of endothelial dysfunction (including biomarkers and peripheral arterial tonometric measures) or nocturnal erections as recorded by the nocturnal electrobioimpedance volumetric assessment were observed between treatment groups. Tadalafil was well tolerated; adverse events included back pain, headache, and dyspepsia. These findings may contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of once-daily tadalafil's effects on phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor-naive men.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it