RELICS OF HIGH-TEMPERATURE CLINOPYROXENE ON THE JOIN Di CaTs WITH UP TO 72 mol.% Ca(Al,Fe3+)AlSiO6 IN THE SKARNS OF CICLOVA AND MAGUREAUA VATEI, CARPATHIANS, ROMANIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the western Carpathians of Romania, clinopyroxene with a very high content of the Ca-Tschermak (up to 24 wt.% Al2O3) and esseneite components occurs as veinlets and inclusions, in places associated with kalsilite, in calcite and in wollastonite very close to the marble contacts of two shallow monzodioritic intrusive complexes, Magureaua Vatei, in the Apuseni Mountains, and Oravita-Ciclova, in Banat, both of Upper Cretaceous age. These relics originate from magmatic veinlets, emplaced at an early stage of the magmatic process and later recrystallized at high temperature (> 800 degrees C) by a CO2-dominated fluid (stage 1). Such fluid probably resulted from the reaction of calcite with the main intrusive body at the time of its emplacement, a reaction also witnessed by the development of a symplectitic association of anorthite and aluminous pyroxene at the intrusive margins, and by the (exceptional) occurrence of Na-rich melilite. Part of the intrusive boundaries were later invaded by pegmatite-forming liquids or fluids that, upon reaction with calcite, first produced idiomorphic crystals of (Fe,Mg)-rich wollastonite (stage 2), occasionally hosting minerals of stage 1, followed by the development of a fibrous wollastonite-grossular association (stage W) accompanied by an (Al-poor) diopside that progressively became Al-rich (stage P) through further modification of the fluid by reaction with calcite. The later appearance of vesuvianite initiated the large-scale postmagmatic hydrothermal process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".