MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2077454379 · doi:10.14740/jmc.v5i4.1285

Hiccups, Hemolysis, Elevated Liver Enzymes and Low Platelets Syndrome and Hepatic Hematoma

2014· article· en· W2077454379 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anna Torgeson, Nathaniel S. Rial, Richard Temple

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHELLP syndromeMedicineElevated liver enzymesCoagulopathyComplicationHemolysisHiccupsScapegoatingEtiologyGastroenterologyHematomaSurgeryAnesthesiaInternal medicinePreeclampsiaPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome, which affects 0.2-0.9% of pregnancies, is one of the most difficult obstetric complications to manage. Affected patients can decompensate acutely, and there are a myriad of possible etiologies to evaluate and treat. Serious complications of HELLP syndrome are disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, abruptio placentae and acute renal failure, which are often interdependent. We describe a rare complication of HELLP that manifested itself in an unusual presentation: right shoulder pain, right upper quadrant pain and hiccups which progressed to fetal intolerance of labor due to an acute expansion of a large liver hematoma. This case represents a unique manifestation of the syndrome that provokes further questions in the evaluation and management of patients affected by HELLP syndrome. J Med Cases. 2014;5(4):234-237 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc1285w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical Cases→Same topicLiver Disease and Transplantation→French-language works237,207→