Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma: report of two cases with unconventional clinical presentations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) is a rare astrocytic neoplasm with a relative circumscribed architecture that typically arises superficially in the cerebral hemispheres of teenagers and young adults. Our aim is to highlight unconventional clinical presentations of this distinct neoplasm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report two cases of PXA with unconventional clinical features, including clinical, pathologic, and immunohistochemical features. RESULTS: The first case developed in the left frontal lobe of a 20-year-old female with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Focal anaplastic features were present. The neoplastic cells were immunoreactive for GFAP, S-100 protein and focally for synaptophysin, with a MIB-1/Ki-67 proliferative labelling index of 16%. The second case developed in a 39-year-old female as a suprasellar neoplasm. The neoplastic cells expressed GFAP, S-100 protein and focally CD34. The adenohypophysis was positive for synaptophysin and pituicytes for TTF1. Molecular studies were negative for BRAF (V600E) mutation in both cases. CONCLUSION: PXA is a distinct circumscribed neoplasm that may present in unexpected locations or clinical backgrounds. Neuropathologists must be aware of these unconventional presentations in order to provide a precise diagnosis leading to appropriate treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it