MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077493329 · doi:10.1039/b718066g

Microstructure of fat bloom development in plain and filled chocolate confections

2008· article· en· W2077493329 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSoft Matter · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Chemistry and Fat Analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMicrostructureScanning electron microscopeBloomMaterials scienceDiffusionComposite materialMineralogyChemistryOpticsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Temperature-controlled environmental scanning electron microscopy was used to examine the microstructural changes in plain solid chocolate and its counterpart stored against a tricaprylin-based filling cream. Sample storage at 26 °C for 40 days led to significant changes in microstructure as a function of time. Surface imperfections (pores, pits, etc.) initially present on the filled confection disappeared within two days whereas those on the control did not throughout the storage period. Morphological changes on the surface of the control were dominated by the growth of needle-like crystals whereas spherulites appeared on the filled chocolate, with large crystals (upwards of 100 microns in length, in some cases) observed in both cases. From a microstructural perspective, both diffusion and capillarity appear to have a part in fat bloom initiation and propagation, though temperature and the presence of a filling fat strongly dictate which mechanism will dominate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it