MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077507981 · doi:10.1063/1.2338310

Computational studies on thermodynamic properties, effective diameters, and free volume of argon using an <i>ab initio</i> potential

2006· article· en· W2077507981 on OpenAlexafffund
Afshin Eskandari Nasrabad, Rozita Laghaei

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWestern Canada Research Grid
KeywordsArgonvan der Waals forceAb initioSupercritical fluidEquation of stateThermodynamicsMonte Carlo methodAb initio quantum chemistry methodsChemistryPhysicsMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A quantum mechanical derived ab initio interaction potential for the argon dimer was tested in molecular simulations to reproduce the thermophysical properties of the vapor-liquid phase equilibria using the Gibbs ensemble Monte Carlo simulations as well as the liquid and supercritical equation of state using the NVT Monte Carlo simulations. The ab initio interaction potential was taken from the literature. A recently developed theory [R. Laghaei et al., J. Chem. Phys. 124, 154502 (2006)] was used to compute the effective diameters of argon in fluid phases and the results were subsequently applied in the generic van der Waals theory to compute the free volume of argon. The calculated densities of the coexisting phases, the vapor pressure, and the equation of state show excellent agreement with experimental values. The effective diameters and free volumes of argon are given over a wide range of densities and temperatures. An empirical formula was used to fit the effective diameters as a function of density and temperature. The computed free volume will be used in future investigations to calculate the transport properties of argon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207