MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077508813 · doi:10.1002/mus.10341

Gentamicin fails to increase dystrophin expression in dystrophin‐deficient muscle

2003· article· en· W2077508813 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Dunant, Maggie C. Walter, George Karpati, Hanns Lochmüller

Bibliographic record

VenueMuscle & Nerve · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersMississippi Department of Agriculture and CommerceDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftMuscular Dystrophy Association
KeywordsDystrophinDuchenne muscular dystrophyAminoglycosidemdx mouseGentamicinMedicineSkeletal muscleMuscular dystrophyIn vivoInternal medicinePharmacologyBioinformaticsAntibioticsBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recent report that aminoglycoside antibiotics restored the expression of functional dystrophin to skeletal muscles of mdx mice, a model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), raised hopes that DMD may be treatable by a conventional drug. Subsequently, several human trials were initiated for evaluating gentamicin therapy in selected DMD patients. An increase of dystrophin expression was not detected in one human trial that was fully reported. Here, we report that we were unable to replicate previously published beneficial results by gentamicin treatment in the mdx mouse. Therefore, we believe that additional animal experimentation is required to further evaluate the possibility of in vivo aminoglycoside therapy of DMD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMuscle & NerveSame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207