MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077517332 · doi:10.7202/030919ar

Un aperçu des habitudes de consommation de la clientèle de Joseph Cartier, marchand général à Saint‑Hyacinthe à la fin du XVIIIe siècle

2006· article· fr· W2077517332 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Claude Desrosiers

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Papers · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Située au croisement des phénomènes d'endettement et d'avance du marché dans l'univers rural bas-canadien, la consommation courante présente des particularités dont l'étude apporte un éclairage essentiel à l'un comme à l'autre: d'abord comme véhicule privilégié de V eclosión économique et matérielle de ce monde rural, via la ronde des biens de consommation, mais aussi comme point de fuite du capital villageois. Le livre de comptes (1794-1797) de Joseph Cartier, marchand général à Saint-Hya- cinthe, a permis l'étude de ce secteur mal connu de la vie économique rurale. Une élaboration méthodologique originale a été mis au point pour la transcription infor- matique et l'analyse du document. Les premiers résultats sur la consommation ont permis de déceler la présence de besoins issus d'habitudes et de valeurs bien enracinées même en périodes de crise, et entraînant pour plusieurs une dépendance économique accrue. La présente étude apar ailleurs conduit à remettre en question le bien-fondé de ïidéal d'autosuffisance dont on affuble beaucoup de sociétés rurales passées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical PapersSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207