MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077552586 · doi:10.1021/ie801915m

Constrained Inverse Fluidization of Light Particles in a Draft Tube Airlift Reactor

2009· article· en· W2077552586 on OpenAlexaff
Ivana M. Šijački, Radmilo Čolović, Bojan Petković, Aleksandar Selakov, Dragan Lj. Petrović, Miodrag N. Tekić, Mirjana Đ. Đurić

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Mixing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDraft tubeFluidizationFluidized bedMaterials scienceAqueous solutionCoalescence (physics)ViscosityMechanicsChemical engineeringSurface tensionChromatographyPolystyreneChemistryThermodynamicsComposite materialPhysicsOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this work was to investigate the main fluidodynamic behavior of a constrained inverse fluidized bed in a draft tube airlift reactor (DT-ALR), with liquid in batch and air in continuous mode. The inverse fluidized bed was formed of relatively large particles (4.3−5.4 mm) that were composed of light polyethylene (PE), in the first case, and of particles (3.7−4.7 mm) that were composed of extremely light polystyrene (PS), in the second case. The influence of physical properties of liquid phase (surface tension and viscosity) on basic fluidodynamic characteristics was examined using the coalescence-inhibiting medium (1 wt % aqueous solution of ethanol) and viscous medium (46 wt % aqueous solution of sucrose). It is shown that the overall gas holdup, induced liquid velocity, minimum fluidization velocity, and bed expansion are dependent on the superficial gas velocity and liquid and solid properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicFluid Dynamics and MixingFrench-language works237,207