MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077649929 · doi:10.2495/sdp-v5-n4-343-350

Reclamation of Derelict Industrial Land in Portugal: Greening is not Enough

2010· article· en· W2077649929 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Luís Loures, Τhomas Panagopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLandscape and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
KeywordsGreeningLand reclamationGeographyEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental scienceArchaeologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A negative effect of the globalization on industry over the past decades was a vast array of obsolete industrial facilities and the various impacts, which were generated from them.In this context, abandonment, sale or demolition of such facilities, were fairly common approaches.However, the creation of new and more severe environmental legislation, the high price of urban land, and the public pressure related with the need to protect the environment, increased the number of post-industrial sites that returns to productive use.Within every problem there is an opportunity.Derelict and contaminated industrial sites have high potential for urban regeneration, ecological restoration and reintegration into the surrounding community.To exemplify the importance of those spaces in the urban landscape, this paper will analyze two industrial reclamation projects realized in Portugal during the last decade (Parque Tejo-Trancão -Expo 98 and Braga Stadium -Euro 2004).The significance of these projects in achieving a sustainable urban landscape is discussed.This article shows that the industrial landscape should be viewed as a resource and its recovery as an opportunity to develop new multifunctional landscapes in which new forests are indispensable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicLandscape and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207