Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver disease is often characterized by an intricate network of multiple, simultaneously interacting factors with organ-specific, as well as systemic effects. The aim of the present study is to introduce a new mathematical model on how to weigh a variety of factors contributing to chronic liver disease by the relevance of their influence on the overall disease processes. METHODS: Liver disease is modelled as the interaction of multiple internal and external factors. Each factor can potentially interact with any of the other factors in the model. The strength of interactions is expressed as per cent. The sum of all interactions contributing to each individual factor adds up to 100%. This model corresponds mathematically to a transposed Markov matrix. The analysis uses the two examples of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). RESULTS: Impaired liver function is the most influential factor and increases in relevance as the degree of hepatic fibrosis increases. The relative importance of treating the primary disease process (HCV or AIH) diminishes as fibrosis develops. Similarly, psychosocial factors become less important with disease progression. Liver transplant is most important for Child's C cirrhosis. It is relatively influential for the early phase of AIH but not HCV, reflecting the fact that some cases of non-cirrhotic AIH can progress rapidly to acute liver failure. CONCLUSION: In a disease process characterized by a large array of multiple interacting factors, the decision tool of a transposed Markov chain helps to sort the contributing factors by the magnitude of their influence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".