MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077661887 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2010.5575160

FPGA based pipelined architecture for action potential simulation in biological neural systems

2010· article· en· W2077661887 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceAdderParallel computingScalabilityMATLABFloating pointMultiplier (economics)Artificial neural networkComputationFLOPSComputer architectureComputer hardwareEmbedded systemAlgorithmLatency (audio)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a hardware based approach to simulate action potential of large numbers of somas within a biological neural network. At the proposed method multiple processors can work in parallel to increase processing power as required. The high speed pipelined architecture for each processor provides the computation speed of one soma per clock ratio and with multiple processors higher speeds are achievable. The design is highly scalable such that the number of cells in the model is limited only by the available memory size. Compartmental approach and Hodgkin-Huxley methods are used as simulation models in our studies. The approach is verified in MATLAB and is synthesized for Xilinx V5-110t-1 as the target FPGA. While not dependent on particular IP cores, the whole implementation is based on Xilinx IP cores including IEEE-754 64-bit floating-point adder and multiplier cores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207