MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077683882 · doi:10.1017/s1478951504040118

Reflections on life and death

2004· article· en· W2077683882 on OpenAlexaff
W.J. PATRICK KELLERMAN

Bibliographic record

VenuePalliative & Supportive Care · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryPsychologyHistoryPsychoanalysisGerontologyLiteratureMedicineArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patrick began writing a journal in 1998 just before he retired from paid work as a result of effects of Multiple Sclerosis. He continued to write irregularly over the subsequent 5 years until he moved into a long-term care facility. He used the journal as a writing exercise, but lived with the frustrations of having to rely upon the computer first to translate his spoken words into written text and then to speak those words back to him. Although Patrick was legally blind, a wheelchair user, and lived with debilitating fatigue, he never let himself be defined by those features. Rather it was his imagination, humor, and quality of thought that captured those around him. These journal excerpts document his reflections on “life, the universe, and everything” in the words of Douglas Adams, a favorite author. The poems were written with the assistance of scribes while Patrick lived in a care facility. Patrick died on January 11, 2004 of pneumonia, having embraced the process of dying as he had his living over the previous 45 years. His family, including his research and life partner, Deborah Stienstra, and their children Rebecca and Cailum, celebrate his life and contributions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0170.024
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0080.026
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalliative & Supportive CareSame topicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207