MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2077693407 · doi:10.1002/pssc.200567123

Evidence of non‐linear to linear transformation of the normal state resistivity in YBCO at constant oxygen content

2006· article· en· W2077693407 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M. M. Abdelhadi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKing Fahd University of Petroleum and MineralsUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsElectrical resistivity and conductivityFlatteningResidual resistivityAnnealing (glass)Materials scienceOxygenCondensed matter physicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Linear relationshipChemistryComposite materialPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We studied the origin of variation in the magnitude and temperature dependence of the normal state resistivity frequently observed in different Y Ba2Cu3O7–δ (YBCO) single crystal or thin film samples with the same T C. We investigated the temperature dependence of resistivity in YBCO thin films, which were subjected to annealing in argon at 120 – 140 °C or aging at room temperature in air. Before annealing (or aging) these films exhibited a non‐linear in‐plane resistivity ρ a b (T), with upward deviation (flattening) in ρ a b (T) from the linear high temperature behavior below 220‐230 K. For all films the annealing causes an increase of resistivity and a transformation of ρ a b (T) from a non‐linear dependence towards a more linear one (less flattening). Our proposed model provides explanation of these phenomena based on the thermally activated redistribution of residual O(5) oxygen in the chain‐layer of YBCO without any change in the overall oxygen content within the sample. The results show that a perfectly linear ρ (T) can be observed in YBCO of oxygen content 7 – δ as low as 6.8. The agreement between the our data for ρ a b (T; t) and the proposed model was very good. (© 2006 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physics→Same topicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism→French-language works237,207→