MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077736329 · doi:10.1063/1.4906235

Self-excited oscillations of two opposing planar air jets

2015· article· en· W2077736329 on OpenAlexafffund
Moustafa Hassaballa, Samir Ziada

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsPlanarJet (fluid)MechanicsMach numberFlappingEntrainment (biomusicology)Oscillation (cell signaling)Particle image velocimetryPhase (matter)OpticsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the self-excited oscillations of two co-planar air jets impinging on each other, referred to, hereafter, by opposing planar jets. The study is performed for a single jet thickness of h = 2 mm and a span-wise aspect ratio of 50. The effects of flow velocity of the jets and the distance between them are examined. The opposing planar jets are found to produce strong acoustic tones over a wide range of jet Mach number and separation distance. Phase-locked averaged particle image velocity measurements showed that the tone is generated by out-of-phase flapping oscillations of the planar jets. These oscillations are sustained by two effects. The first is the high stagnation pressure at the impingement region, which deflects the jets laterally in opposite directions away from their common centerline, while the second effect is the cross stream oscillating velocity in the entrainment regions around the jet exits, which forces the jets back towards their common centerline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet FlowsFrench-language works237,207