MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077736967 · doi:10.1096/fj.00-0619fje

Resistance to HIV‐1 infection among African sex workers is associated with global hyporesponsiveness in interleukin4 production

2001· article· en· W2077736967 on OpenAlexafffund
Harsha N. Trivedi, Francis A. Plummer, Aggrey O. Anzala, Ephantus Njagi, Job J. Bwayo, Elizabeth Ngugi, Joanne E. Embree, Kent T. HayGlass

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersMedical Research Council CanadaNational Health Research Institutes
KeywordsHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Sex workersResistance (ecology)MedicineImmunologyVirologyEnvironmental healthBiologyEcologyPopulationResearch methodology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We previously identified HIV‐1 resistant prostitutes who remain persistently HIV‐1 PCR‐ and antibody‐negative despite continued heavy exposure to HIV‐1 through sex work. We hypothesized that differences in virus‐specific cytokine responses are associated with resistance vs. susceptibility to infection. Although polyclonal activation failed to reveal such differences, antigen‐mediated activation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in primary culture by using intact HIV IIIB demonstrates that resistance is associated with enhanced virus‐driven interferon γ and markedly reduced IL‐4 responses relative to those seen in HIV‐1 seropositive prostitutes (CDC stage A1, CD4>500/ml). No changes were detectable in HIV‐stimulated interleukin (IL) 10 and IL‐13 production, but IL‐5 responses were somewhat increased in resistant sex workers. Moreover, the IL‐4 responses of HIV‐1 resistant women to a panel of unrelated recall antigens were more than 20‐fold reduced relative to HIV‐infected prostitutes or those of healthy Kenyan women not involved in sex work. Thus, resistant women differ from seropositive‐infected women and healthy controls by exhibiting a profound global hyporesponsiveness in their capacity to generate IL‐4 responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207