MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077774044 · doi:10.4271/2015-01-0923

Study of Transient Effects in the Internal Flow of a Diesel Fuel Injector

2015· article· en· W2077774044 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohamed Chouak, Alexandre Mousseau, Damien Reveillon, Louis Dufresne, Patrice Seers

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
KeywordsInjectorTransient (computer programming)Diesel fuelAutomotive engineeringFuel injectionEnvironmental scienceFlow (mathematics)Diesel engineNuclear engineeringMechanicsComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transient characteristics of the internal flow dominate all the ensuing processes: spray, fuel-air mixture formation as well as combustion and pollutants formation. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the dynamics of the injectors' internal flow. The objective of this work is to study all transient effects that may impact the internal flow of a single hole injector under different conditions. Since the numerical investigation of such a complex flow is hampered by several factors for the real operating conditions-namely the turbulence, the cavitation and the needle motion-this work is divided into two parts. In the first part, only the effects of turbulence and cavitation are considered through the study of the effects of the fuel properties as well as the injection conditions at the fully open needle position. The impact of these effects is studied by means of the Reynolds and the cavitation number. To achieve this, simulations have been performed using an Eulerian single-fluid model based on the Rayleigh-Plesset equation for bubble growth. Both the Reynolds and the cavitation numbers affect the in-nozzle flow and it has been confirmed that they are the only dimensionless numbers that govern the flow. In the second part, the main objective is to explain the hysteresis of turbulence between needle opening and closing. Authors who identified this behavior observed that the turbulence level at the nozzle exit is mainly due to the needle motion regardless of the nozzle geometry and of the presence of cavitation. Hence, only the effects of the needle motion and the turbulence associated are studied in non-cavitating conditions in the present work. To achieve this, a reliable moving mesh strategy has been developed and implemented. Using a URANS approach, the internal flow structure and its dynamics are finely analyzed by emphasizing the transient effects of the needle motion. Especially, the hysteresis of turbulence has been explained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207