Depression in patients with Huntington disease correlates with alterations of the brain stem raphe depicted by transcranial sonography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transcranial sonography (TCS) has become a new diagnostic tool in the evaluation of extrapyramidal disorders. Studies of TCS report alterations of the mesencephalic raphe in patients with depression. The aim of this study was to evaluate TCS findings in patients with Huntington disease in correlation with their neurologic and psychiatric status. METHODS: We recruited patients with genetically confirmed Huntington disease. The neurological and psychiatric status of participants was assessed by independent physicians. Echogenicities were investigated according to examination protocol for extrapyramidal disorders using a Siemens Sonoline Elegra system. The sonography examiner was blinded for clinical data. RESULTS: We included 39 patients in our study; 21 patients (53.8%) showed symptoms of depression at the time of evaluation and, of those, 15 (71.4%) had hypoechogenic raphe structures. Thirty patients (76.9%) had a history of depressive episodes, 19 (63.3%) of them with hypoechogenic raphe structures. All 9 patients without a history of depressive episodes showed normal echogenicity of raphe structures (sensitivity 63.3%, specificity 100%). Twelve (70.6%) of the 17 patients with Huntington disease who showed psychiatric disturbances prior to the occurrence of motor symptoms exhibited pathological raphe echogenicity (sensitivity 70.6%, specificity 68.2%). LIMITATIONS: Most of the patients were taking antichoreatic medication, which particularly influences neurologic status. Thus, a meaningful interpretation of the correlation between TCS findings and neurologic features was limited. CONCLUSION: As a novel finding, a relation between mesencephalic raphe echogenicity and depressive state could be identified in patients with Huntington disease. An alteration of the serotonergic brain stem raphe might be involved in the pathogenesis of depression in these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".