MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077810549 · doi:10.3138/cras-s033-02-02

“Les beaux jours sont passés”: Staging Whiteness and Postcolonial Ambivalence in The Europeans by Henry James

2003· article· en· W2077810549 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of American Studies · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheater, Performance, and Music History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCriticismLightnessComedyContext (archaeology)LiteratureCharacter (mathematics)PhilosophyAmbivalenceArtArt historyAestheticsHistoryPsychoanalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Henry James’s The Europeans1 has often been overlooked in critical circles, perhaps due to the author’s reluctance to include it in a col­lected edition of his works, for “in a letter of 1878 to William James ... [he] agree[s] to his brother’s criticism that the work was ‘thin and empty’” (EU, Introduction 8). Jamesian critics who briefly mention the novel view it either as a counterpart to The American or in terms of “the pleasing clarity of language and the lightness of comedy” (Poirier 144) the encounters between the Americans and the Europe­ans entail. The quid pro quo nature of these exchanges continues to mark the vein of criticism placing The Europeans within the realm of “dramatic form,” with an ending that “suggests a variation on Shakespeare’s stage pastorals” (Long 68). More recent Jamesian crit­ics such as Patricia McKee, Sara Blair, and Kenneth W. Warren have turned away from prior structuralist approaches by exploring the relationship between James, the construction of race, and his por­trayal of consumer capitalism. Whereas these critical themes are studied within the context of James’s later works, such as The Wings of the Dove, The Golden Bowl, or The Ambassadors, I would argue that the very lightness of being noted in The Europeans is an instance of more contemporary critical discourses contained in an early piece by Henry James. This paper shall address how the character of Eugenia in The Europeans becomes the contested terrain whereby ”lightness” is challenged as it becomes a form of whiteness. To that end, more encompassing global implications played out in the socio-political theatre of a newly developing American colonial venture are also made clear and shall also be explored here. The first view found in The Europeans is “a narrow grave-yard in the heart of a bustling, indifferent city, seen from the windows of a gloomy-looking inn” (33). The grave-yard “is at no time an object of enlivening suggestion; and the spectacle is not at its best when the mouldy tombstones and funeral umbrage have received the ineffec­tual refreshment of a dull, moist snow-fall” (EU, 33). This dismal opening scene recalls, as Robert K. Martin suggests, “the verbal and thematic echoes ... of Blithedale [Romance which] opens not only with a storm, but also with ’decayed trees’ and ’withered leaves’“ (Mar­tin, 57). It is also indicative of some aspect of the “Ruin” alluded to in Hawthorne’s preface to The Marble Faun, whereby Hawthorne states that “Romance and poetry, like ivy, lichens and wall-flowers, need Ruin to make them grow” (The Marble Faun, 3). “Ruin” there­fore becomes one of the themes in The Europeans, both in the sense that Eugenia and Felix bring with them aspects of an older, worldly European culture and in that if Eugenia cannot find her fortune in America, she will be financially ruined. Another connotative sense of “ruin” rests upon Eugenia’s acceptance in America since the homogenous racially constructed nature of American society of that time also stands to be ruined. The “grave-yard” thus becomes sym­bolic of Eugenia’s attempts to conform to American society and the death of her American dream as she returns to Europe, unmarried and having “gained” nothing. Particularly striking in the opening scene is that the “mouldy tomb­stones” and “funeral umbrage” are covered by snow. I would there­fore argue that although the city is considered “indifferent”, James subtly interweaves a language of racial difference within the rural setting of the novel. The “spectacle” observed by Eugenia becomes one through which constructions of race are made by not only explicitly mentioning the ”foreign” (O)ther, but also through the narrative construction of a specifically American whiteness. Eugenia represents a form of miscegenation threatening to the ”purity” of the rural American society to which she wants to belong; her un-con­sumability, unlike the black slaves and Oriental Chinese objects found throughout the novel, makes her especially menacing. Eugenia’s presence takes on a double meaning as she becomes the vehicle for various sites of racial discourses regarding the threat of the Other and acts as a signifier for the burgeoning colonial and imperial American enterprises of the time. Hence, the potential for spectacular ”ruin” runs high, given the racial and socio-political repercussions that could occur should the threat Eugenia poses not be contained or expelled.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.955

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it