MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077821056 · doi:10.1021/ie010785x

An Efficient Method to Calculate Three-Phase Free-Water Flash for Water−Hydrocarbon Systems

2002· article· en· W2077821056 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsHoneywell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlash evaporationFlash (photography)Phase (matter)ComputationHydrocarbonWork (physics)Reduction (mathematics)Flash pointBinary numberThermodynamicsComputer scienceChemistryMathematicsAlgorithmOpticsPhysicsArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the free-water assumption and a modified Rachford−Rice (MRR) equation proposed in this work, a novel method is developed to calculate the three-phase flash of water−hydrocarbon mixtures. In the method, the number of phases can be determined instantly, the computation is as fast as that of two-phase flash, and binary parameters between water and hydrocarbons are only optional. The efficiency of the developed method is demonstrated by its reduction to the accurate Scheffer equation, its good results for two real systems, and its favorable comparison with regular three-phase flash.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it