“The Man Without a Country” and America’s Post-war Crisis of National Belonging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hale’s “The Man Without a Country” turns on itself: The Man without a Country emerges not as the story’s one-dimensional villain but as its complex hero—a new sort of cosmopolitan patriot. With its powerful evocation of sentimental attachment to the figure of the American expatriate voyager, Hale’s tale reflects the author’s struggle to re-assert the sentimental power of an imagined community in the new context of a wide-ranging global existence. Hale may have begun writing in response to the crisis of national belonging triggered by the Civil War, hoping that this piece of invented folklore would reinforce or restore an older mode of bounded American national self-definition, but “The Man without a Country” in fact anticipates the outline of an alternative vision and stance reflecting the new international situation emerging over the course of the 19th-century—giving us a prescient portrait of an American identity that finds itself most fully in trans-national situations The Man Without a Country de Hale se retourne contre lui-même : The Man Without a Country n’apparaît pas comme le scélérat unidimensionnel de l’histoire, mais comme un héro complexe – une nouvelle sorte de patriote cosmopolite. Grâce à sa puissante évocation d’un attachement sentimental au personnage du voyageur américain expatrié, l’ouvrage de Hale reflète la lutte de l’auteur qui cherche à réaffirmer la puissance sentimentale d’une communauté imaginaire dans le nouveau contexte d’une vaste existence globale. Hale peut avoir commencé à écrire afin de répondre à une crise d’appartenance nationale déclenchée par la guerre de Sécession, en espérant que cette pièce de folklore inventé permettrait de renforcer ou de restaurer un ancien mode d’autodéfinition nationale américaine fermée, mais The Man without a Country anticipe de fait les grandes lignes d’une autre vision et façon de faire qui reflètent la nouvelle situation internationale émergeant durant le 19e siècle – et nous offre un portrait prescient d’une identité américaine qui se retrouve le mieux dans des situations transnationales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.026 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".