Preparation and morphology study of microporous poly(HEMA–MMA) particles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Porous poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate‐methyl methacrylate) particles crosslinked with ethylene glycol dimethacrylate were synthesized by free‐radical suspension copolymerization in an aqueous phase initiated by an oil‐soluble initiator, 2,2‐azobisisobutyronitrile. 1‐octanol was used as a pore forming agent (porogen). The porous structures, the particle morphology, and the swelling capacity of the resultant polymer in water at room temperature were studied at different crosslink densities and under various porogen concentrations. The analysis via Scanning Electronic Microscopy (SEM) indicated that permanent pores remained in the dried polymeric particles prepared in the presence of the porogen at certain crosslink densities. According to the studies via the SEM pictures and the pore size distributions, higher porogen concentration promotes the formation of more pores, and higher crosslink density results in narrower pore size distribution. The swelling capacity of the particles in water at room temperature decreases with an increase in the crosslink density, and the existence of the highly porous structures enhances the swelling capacity of the porous particles of poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate‐methyl methacrylate). © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 707–715, 2007
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".