MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077861401 · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/33/44/305

Localization transition for a randomly coloured self-avoiding walk at an interface

2000· article· en· W2077861401 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics A Mathematical and General · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComonomerPhase diagramMonte Carlo methodLattice (music)SolventStatistical physicsRandom walkDelocalized electronInterface (matter)EnumerationPhase transitionCondensed matter physicsChemical physicsPhase (matter)PhysicsChemistryMathematicsCombinatoricsPhysical chemistryQuantum mechanicsOrganic chemistryPolymerNuclear magnetic resonanceStatisticsMonomerAdsorption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a lattice model of random heteropolymers at the interface between two immiscible solvents. One solvent is preferred by one comonomer, while the other solvent is preferred by the other comonomer. We investigate the phase diagram of the system and, in particular, the transition from localization at the interface to delocalization into one of the two phases. We prove some rigorous results concerning the system and, in particular, show that there is a phase change as the solvent qualities for the two comonomers are varied. We use Monte Carlo methods and exact enumeration and series analysis techniques to map out the form of the phase diagram.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it