MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077866983 · doi:10.4000/civilisations.216

Fractures sociales et liens solidaires intracommunautaires dans les Andes septentrionales du Pérou

2006· article· fr· W2077866983 on OpenAlexaff
Jacques Malengreau

Bibliographic record

VenueCivilisations · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsÉcole Nationale d'Administration Publique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article précise les lignes de fracture sociale entre une communauté villageoise andine du Nord du Pérou et des groupes segmentaires qui à la fois composent, divisent et débordent celle-ci. Ces divisions sont analysées à travers les remembrements fonciers, la fourniture de services sociaux collectifs ainsi que les entreprises qui reflètent des intérêts à la fois commerciaux et particularistes. Fractures sociales et liens solidaires y forment un subtil équilibre où s’opposent ou se superposent selon les circonstances, voisinages, entreprises particulières et origines communes. La communauté et le territoire autour duquel elle se reproduit et se reconstruit en permanence est l’enjeu d’oppositions entre ceux qui s’identifient à un espace commun à la fois d’ascendance, de résidence et d’action commune, et ceux qui font de leur seule affirmation comme hijos del lugar ou « fils du lieu », le prétexte pour en tirer des bénéfices privatifs d’ordre matériel. En même temps, le développement des liens segmentaires et notamment familiaux, indépendamment du territoire communautaire, rétrécissent les espaces solidaires et renforcent la compétitivité entre eux en favorisant les intérêts mercantiles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCivilisationsSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207