MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077874963 · doi:10.1139/p08-074

Wave properties of plasma surrounding the event horizon of a nonrotating black hole

2008· article· en· W2077874963 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Sharif, Ghulam Mustafa

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsEvent horizonMagnetohydrodynamicsMagnetosphereDispersion relationPlasmaQuantum electrodynamicsSchwarzschild radiusWave propagationDispersion (optics)AttenuationClassical mechanicsBlack hole (networking)HorizonSchwarzschild metricComputational physicsEvent (particle physics)AstrophysicsQuantum mechanicsGravitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the wave properties of a cold isothermal plasma in the vicinity of a Schwarzschild black-hole event horizon. The Fourier-analyzed perturbed 3+1 general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics equations are examined such that the complex dispersion relations are obtained for nonrotating, rotating nonmagnetized, and rotating magnetized backgrounds. The propagation and attenuation vectors along with the refractive index are obtained (shown graphically) to study the dispersive properties of the medium near the event horizon. The results show that no information can be obtained from the Schwarzschild magnetosphere. Further, the pressure stops the existence of normal dispersion of waves.PACS Nos.: 95.30.Sf, 95.30.Qd, 04.30.Nk

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207