<i>cis</i>-Cyclononene Conformational Families and a Crystallographic Example of a Skew-Chair−Boat Type-2 Conformation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyclononanes from the 7 low-energy conformational archetypal families (twist-boat[bond]chair, twist-chair[bond]boat, twist-chair[bond]chair, twist-chair[bond]twist-chair, skew-chair[bond]boat, skew-chair[bond]chair, and skew-boat[bond]boat) were transformed into 12 of 13 MM3 stochastically generated cis-cyclononenes. This was done by systematically converting single bond synclinal endocyclic torsion angles, one-at-a-time, into double-bond synperiplanar analogues, followed by geometry optimization [e.g. density functional theory B3LYP/6-31G(d)]. Torsion angles adjacent to the new double bond maintained their signs, while their magnitudes usually changed considerably to accommodate the new neighboring synperiplanar torsion angles. The six remaining torsion angles all maintained their signs and approximate magnitudes compared to corresponding values in the seven saturated parent structures. As a result, the same "twist"/"skew" conformational descriptors previously used for the saturated conformers can now also be applied to the corresponding unsaturated analogues. Three conformational families have multiple members (subtypes) in which the double bond is located at different positions on the same ring conformation. The solid-state structures of (+/-)-1-phenyl-1,3,4,5,6,7-hexahydro-2,6-benzoxazonine-6-carbonitrile (22) and (1RS,3SR)-1-phenyl-3-methyl-1,3,4,5,6,7-hexahydro-2,6-benzoxazonine-6-carbonitrile (23) were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. The asymmetric unit of the Ponemacr; unit cell for 22 contains two symmetry-unrelated molecules, both of which exhibit a skew-chair-boat (SCBtype-2) conformation identical to that found for crystalline 23. This subtype has yet to be found in the Cambridge Crystallographic DataBase. Crystal lattice packing considerations alone cannot explain the observation of the SCBtype-2 conformation since (1)H NMR spectroscopy shows the same conformational bias when the crystals are dissolved in CDCl(3).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".