Spermatogenesis recovery in protein-restricted rats subjected to a normal protein diet after weaning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated the pre- and postnatal effects of protein restriction (8% vs 20% crude protein) on different parameters of spermatogenesis in adult rat offspring. Body and testis weights as well as the seminiferous tubular diameter were reduced in those animals that received the protein-restricted diet after weaning, although these parameters recovered when a 20% protein diet was offered subsequently. The numbers of spermatogonia, spermatocytes, spermatids and Leydig cells were reduced in undernourished animals, whilst the Sertoli cell number did not change. Prenatal programming effect was observed only in the spermatogonial or proliferative phase of spermatogenesis. However, the intake of the normal protein diet after weaning brought many of the testicular parameters evaluated back to normal in 70-day-old rats. A significant reduction of the meiotic index, Sertoli cell supporting capacity and spermatogenic efficiency was observed in animals subjected to protein undernutrition throughout their lives. The data presented show that protein restriction impairs the normal development of the testis in different ways, depending on the period during which the restriction was imposed, and the negative effects on spermatogenesis are more severe when undernutrition occurs from conception to adulthood; however, the return to a normal protein diet after weaning recovers the spermatogenic process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".