MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077962464 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2012-0530

Fourier transform far-infrared spectroscopy of HN<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> on the AILES beamline of synchrotron SOLEIL

2013· article· en· W2077962464 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sébastien Gruet, Alexis Morvan, Olivier Pirali, T. Chamaillé, E. Bouisset, M. Vervloët

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynchrotronBeamlinePhysicsSynchrotron radiationSpectroscopySpectral lineOpticsAbsorption spectroscopyInfrared spectroscopyFourier transform infrared spectroscopyFourier transformInfraredFourier transform spectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Atomic physicsChemistryBeam (structure)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the pure rotation spectrum of HN2+ as measured by Fourier transform (FT) absorption spectroscopy in the 20–40 cm−1 spectral range. The cations are produced in a liquid nitrogen cooled hollow cathode discharge cell developed on the AILES beamline of synchrotron SOLEIL. The setup was optimized by recording rotation–vibration spectra of H3+ (with the ν2 band centered at about 2521 cm−1), HN2+ (with the ν1 band centered at about 3234 cm−1), and HCO+ (with the ν1 band centered at about 3089 cm−1). Many rotation–vibration lines have been assigned for each ion and five pure rotational transitions have been detected for HN2+. These results demonstrate the feasibility of recording far-infrared spectra of cationic species using FT broad band spectroscopy associated with the bright synchrotron radiation continuum as an alternative to laser-based frequency tunable techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207